Breadcrumbs

PITA ( not PETA)

More
17 Nov 2018 20:50 #1719 by John Jones
Replied by John Jones on topic PITA ( not PETA)
Those are the issues that make the experimental option very attractive, but I really like my Alon. Do you have any 337s that you would like to share?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Gordie Meade
  • Topic Author
  • Away
More
16 Nov 2018 20:16 #1718 by Gordie Meade
PITA ( not PETA) was created by Gordie Meade
One of the largest pains about owning an M-10, is the fact that not many were built so very few usable STCs exist. Every time I want to do an update, for something as simple as installing an LED direct replacement for a landing light, you must do a 337 field approval. I have a stack of them now. I put in a fuel flow indicator, 337. a digital CHT/EGT, 337, LED tip strobes, 337. I want to put in a digital oil temp gauge, LED landing and taxi lights, a digital tach (My BF Goodrich tach croaked), all of which require a field approval. All of this stuff is more accurate , more efficient, and less maintenance that the original equipment but, even though it's an STCed direct replacement for the same parts on other certificated aircraft, I have to do field approvals, which is NOT a trivial solution. I'm finished venting now.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.126 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum