Breadcrumbs

  1. Forum
  3. DIscussions
  5. Tech Help
  7. General
  9. McCauley vs Sensenich Prop for O-200

McCauley vs Sensenich Prop for O-200

  • 9881
21 Aug 2015 09:53 #1 by 9881
Replied by 9881 on topic McCauley vs Sensenich Prop for O-200
If you are talking about a real O-200 and not a C-85 rebuilt with O-200 parts... then I would highly recommend a DCM 6950. I fly a 415-C with a real O-200. It is a wonderful combo. Many Ercoupe O-200 installs were incorrectly steered to a 6948. The 6948 is too low or flat and will cause over-reeving when the engine id broken in. The STC owner from the 70s sent documentation indicating the over-rev situation and recommend a 6950.

Brian Sanborn

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 Aug 2015 15:34 #2 by Larry Snyder
Replied by Larry Snyder on topic McCauley vs Sensenich Prop for O-200
My experience is that the square-tipped McCauleys (I can't remember A or B) are better than the round-tipped ones. If you want to get the RPMs up, make sure the engine is set up right, then go to a flatter prop. 71 seems too long for an O-200 I'd go with a 69. Maybe go down to a 48 or 49 pitch. Bet you could hit redline then.

Maybe someone with an O-200 can give you wiser advice!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Aug 2015 01:41 #3 by Jan Lee
McCauley vs Sensenich Prop for O-200 was created by Jan Lee
Need info on using McCauley DCM 6948, 6950 or 6952 with O-200 camshaft. Also, anyone using the Sensenich 69CK-0-52L or other pitch successfully on O-200?

With original CM 7150 we are only able to get it to 2500. Would like to get it up to 2750.

Jan at SandpointInspection dot com

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  1. Forum
  3. DIscussions
  5. Tech Help
  7. General
  9. McCauley vs Sensenich Prop for O-200
Time to create page: 0.080 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum